Verkada's Undisclosed Facial Recognition Capabilities
Investigation into Verkada's deployment of facial recognition and person-tracking features in its camera platform, which the FTC found were used without adequate notice or consent.
Unlock Full Privacy Intelligence
Get deep-dive reports on every company that touches your data. SeekerPro members see breach timelines, DSAR success rate...
Learn MoreAudit Your Site Free
Run a full privacy and compliance audit on any website in 60 seconds. NexusBro scans cookie consent, tracker behavior, a...
Learn MoreAutomate Privacy Compliance
Stop wasting hours on manual DSAR filings and cookie consent management. BliniBot handles the busywork so your team can ...
Learn MoreKey Findings
- #1FTC found facial recognition deployed without adequate disclosure
- #2Person-tracking capabilities could follow individuals across all facility cameras
- #3Sales team reportedly demonstrated tracking capabilities on unknowing passersby
- #4FTC complaint described concerning pattern of tracking women without consent
- #5Facial recognition data lacked basic security measures before 2021 breach
Investigation Details
According to the FTC's 2024 enforcement action, Verkada's camera platform included facial recognition and person-of-interest tracking features that were deployed without adequate disclosure to the individuals being monitored. The system could reportedly identify and track specific individuals across all cameras in a facility using facial recognition and appearance matching. The FTC complaint alleged that Verkada's sales team demonstrated these capabilities using cameras pointed at public spaces near the company's offices, including tracking women without their knowledge in what the complaint described as a concerning pattern. Verkada also reportedly failed to implement basic security measures for its facial recognition data, contributing to the severity of the 2021 breach.
verkada has been the subject of increasing scrutiny over its facial recognition use practices. Privacy researchers and regulatory bodies across multiple jurisdictions have documented concerns about how the company handles user data, particularly regarding consent, transparency, and data minimization principles. The findings suggest a pattern of prioritizing business metrics over user privacy, a trend observed across the broader technology industry. Users affected by these practices have limited recourse without proactive intervention such as filing formal complaints with data protection authorities or submitting DSAR requests.
Regulatory responses have varied significantly. European data protection authorities have been more aggressive in enforcement under GDPR, while US enforcement remains fragmented across state-level privacy laws. The investigation highlights the need for stronger federal privacy legislation and more transparent corporate data practices. Affected users should consider reviewing their privacy settings, submitting data deletion requests, and exploring privacy-preserving alternatives recommended by independent researchers.
Related Scandals
Take Action
Protect Your Data Across Every Platform
Tools trusted by thousands of privacy-conscious users worldwide
No card charged today. Cancel anytime.
Frequently Asked Questions
What data does verkada collect?
Our investigation reveals verkada engages in facial recognition use. Investigation into Verkada's deployment of facial recognition and person-tracking features in its camera platform, which the FTC found were used without adequate notice or consent.
Is verkada's facial recognition use legal?
The legality of verkada's practices varies by jurisdiction. Under GDPR, companies must have a lawful basis for data processing. Under CCPA, California residents can opt out of data sales.
How can I protect myself from verkada?
You can submit a data subject access request (DSAR) to verkada, opt out of data collection through their privacy settings, or use privacy-preserving alternatives.