Cellebrite's Phone-Cracking Tools Used by Governments Worldwide
How Cellebrite sells device-extraction technology to law enforcement in over 150 countries, including nations with poor human rights records, to bypass smartphone encryption.
Unlock Full Privacy Intelligence
Get deep-dive reports on every company that touches your data. SeekerPro members see breach timelines, DSAR success rate...
Learn MoreAudit Your Site Free
Run a full privacy and compliance audit on any website in 60 seconds. NexusBro scans cookie consent, tracker behavior, a...
Learn MoreAutomate Privacy Compliance
Stop wasting hours on manual DSAR filings and cookie consent management. BliniBot handles the busywork so your team can ...
Learn MoreKey Findings
- #1UFED tools sold to law enforcement in over 150 countries
- #2Clients reportedly included agencies in countries with documented human rights abuses
- #3Premium tool claims to bypass lock screens on most iOS and Android devices
- #4US police reportedly used Cellebrite tools before obtaining warrants in some cases
- #5Company valued at $2.4 billion at 2021 public listing
Investigation Details
Cellebrite reportedly sells its UFED (Universal Forensic Extraction Device) and Premium unlocking tools to law enforcement agencies in over 150 countries. According to a 2021 investigation by The Intercept, Cellebrite's clients included agencies in China, Russia, Bangladesh, and other countries with documented human rights abuses. The company's Premium tool claims to bypass the lock screen on most iOS and Android devices, accessing messages, photos, app data, and location history. A 2023 report found that US police departments routinely used Cellebrite devices during arrests, sometimes extracting data before obtaining a warrant. Cellebrite went public in 2021 at a valuation of $2.4 billion, demonstrating the commercial scale of the digital forensics market.
cellebrite has been the subject of increasing scrutiny over its government contracts practices. Privacy researchers and regulatory bodies across multiple jurisdictions have documented concerns about how the company handles user data, particularly regarding consent, transparency, and data minimization principles. The findings suggest a pattern of prioritizing business metrics over user privacy, a trend observed across the broader technology industry. Users affected by these practices have limited recourse without proactive intervention such as filing formal complaints with data protection authorities or submitting DSAR requests.
Regulatory responses have varied significantly. European data protection authorities have been more aggressive in enforcement under GDPR, while US enforcement remains fragmented across state-level privacy laws. The investigation highlights the need for stronger federal privacy legislation and more transparent corporate data practices. Affected users should consider reviewing their privacy settings, submitting data deletion requests, and exploring privacy-preserving alternatives recommended by independent researchers.
Related Scandals
Take Action
Protect Your Data Across Every Platform
Tools trusted by thousands of privacy-conscious users worldwide
No card charged today. Cancel anytime.
Frequently Asked Questions
What data does cellebrite collect?
Our investigation reveals cellebrite engages in government contracts. How Cellebrite sells device-extraction technology to law enforcement in over 150 countries, including nations with poor human rights records, to bypass smartphone encryption.
Is cellebrite's government contracts legal?
The legality of cellebrite's practices varies by jurisdiction. Under GDPR, companies must have a lawful basis for data processing. Under CCPA, California residents can opt out of data sales.
How can I protect myself from cellebrite?
You can submit a data subject access request (DSAR) to cellebrite, opt out of data collection through their privacy settings, or use privacy-preserving alternatives.